| Opponents of global warming/ climate change always | | | | hacked. Opponents of global warming were behind |
| seem to use arguments that are easily countered: | | | | this and they claim that the emails prove that global |
| plants need carbon dioxide, researchers are just lying, | | | | warming isn't real. If they can get access to the |
| etc. While their first point is correct at first glance, | | | | emails, they most likely were able to alter them too. |
| with a little logic they would realize that their point is | | | | But let's assume these scientists actually did fudge |
| pointless. Yes, it is true that plants breath carbon | | | | their results. There are still hundreds of scientists all |
| dioxide, BUT humans have been killing so many trees | | | | over the world who still are getting the same results |
| and plants each year that this truth is moot. | | | | that global warming is real. |
| Right now the amount of carbon dioxide is increasing | | | | Not to mention the fact that the poles are starting |
| steadily, and with less plants to change this carbon | | | | to melt. (I read somewhere that methane gas is |
| dioxide into oxygen, climate change is most likely to | | | | starting to be released from this ice as well, which |
| get worse over time. The more you examine the | | | | could further increase climate change) There is large |
| opponents' arguments, the more their arguments | | | | amounts of evidence that shows that the Earth has |
| actually back up the evidence that global warming is | | | | been warming steadily for a while now, yet some |
| truly happening. | | | | people still will not believe it for reasons that are |
| A while back, some emails of U.N. researchers were | | | | easily countered. |