Climate Change Policy - Does Australia Need It?

The other day I listened to a presentation from themitigation with the bonus of food production.
CEO of a company in the carbon game. Branching outNo doubt you are thinking, 'Oh, but there has to be a
from bio-energy, this company has developed smartcatch'. And maybe there is in the scalability, sources
technology to grow algae using the CO2 emittedof nitrogen, finding enough land next to power
from coal fired power stations.stations or many others we haven't conjured up. The
It was an impressive story. The algae do what algaepoint is though, that the combination of smarts,
do in high-tech plastic bags and convert carbonentrepreneurship and willing investors can be a
dioxide to plant material at a claimed rate of up topowerful tool when let loose on a problem.
800 t per hectare (for comparison average wheatIf business actions can fix the climate problem, then
yield in Australia hovers around 1.5 t per hectare). Awhy do we need policy? The reason is this. There
quarter of the algal biomass harvested is extractableare only a few courageous entrepreneurs and,
as vegetable oil and the rest as vegetable proteinespecially in Australia, even fewer risk taking
(dry pellets). The potable water byproduct is recycledinvestors. This means that the rest, the mainstream
back into the bags for the next batch of algae.who are risk averse and a tad timid, need help to
The list of salable items that can be manufacturedsolve the problem; and this is the role of policy. For
from the algal produce was endless.policy can provide support, encouragement rules for
If I were an investor, I would be muscling my waya social climate that help us help ourselves.
through the heavy hitters already camped outsideSince the Australian government dumped its own
the company's offices, and buy whatever shares ICarbon Pollution Reduction Scheme, an emissions
could. Not surprisingly the owners see no need to selltrading solution to climate change, the issue that
shares in the company to the public.Prime Minister Rudd has called 'the greatest moral
And the thing was that this particular entrepreneur,challenge of our age', the media has talked of
with a genuine smile on his face, did not care one iotabackflips and the taxi drivers have expressed their
about a carbon price, greenhouse gas emissions or adisappointment at broken political promises. All the
climate change policy. Why would he? He had salablepeople I have spoken to are just a bit depressed at
products (oil and protein) that a host of buyersit all because the public wanted action.
wanted, and he was making them from industrialThese reactions to political weakness are inevitable
waste (CO2) that everybody wants to get rid of. Hebecause we do need policy, we need it to give us
had found a great win-win. And when that happensconfidence and in the case of climate change policy
it's all good, including in this case a powerfulwe need it now.
combination of greenhouse gas abatement and