Climate Change: Why the Economy Matters

Bill Clinton's 1992 campaign had a slogan as a reminderwhere the materials fester and produce more
to campaigners; "It's the economy, stupid". Thedangerous gases? How about the thousands of
phrase has passed into history but it still rings as trueregulations that are required if not to keep people
today as it did then and green campaigners need tosafe, at least doesn't poison them too quickly? How
recognise that.about the idea that productivity is boosted by
 employing fewer people, so cutting more and more
Economic activity is the bed rock of our civilisationout from a share of the riches? How about the
and the basis of much human preoccupation. There istendency to globalisation that erodes cultural
not a sovereign state that does not  rely ondiversity? How about the death and destruction of
economic activity, even if the basis of it is outsidethousands of species of animals, insects and plants?
what some would consider legal. All GovernmentsIs accountancy really telling us the reality "as is"?
depend on business to employ people (whose incomeWhen the BP well in the Gulf was spewing oil that it
they can tax) and generate profits (that theycould sell of around US$80 per barrel, it was facing
re-invest to build the business or share withfines of between US$1,100 and US$4,300 to
stockholders, which can then be taxed). For theircompensate for the damage that each spilt barrel
part, businesses rely on government to keep thecaused! What is the true price of oil?
peace and provide a fair set of rules that everyone 
abides by. An individual that is not "economicallyLike a lot of human problems, we didn't set out to do
active" or family that does not have at least oneit the wrong way. Modern accountancy was invented
"economically active" person in it is likely to beabout 500 years ago in Italy where double-entry
severely disadvantaged. Most places in the worldbook-keeping was first used. Double-entry
follow this model and most have combined it with abook-keeping changed the way that people were
form of democracy where the population get aable to think about business and virtually all the
regular chance to approve or change the people whodecision making tools we use today like pay-back
are responsible for making up the rules. Althoughtimes and returns on investment could not exist
democracy is not necessary for economicwithout it. It was and is an amazing system and at its
development, it has become ingrained in the Westernintellectual core is the concept of "balance". Even
psyche so much that world countries where thetoday when a financier wants to know the financial
central government is so weak or ineffective that itstrength of a company, she looks at the "balance
has little practical control over much of its territory,sheet".  Consider, for a moment how very different
or where there is little or no provision of publicthe world in 15th century Italy was compared to
services, or where widespread corruption andtoday. In human terms, there were many fewer of
criminality exists, or where there are refugees andus for start, about a twentieth of our number today.
involuntary movement of populations and sharpWe had also not had our industrial revolution. Little
economic decline it is said to be a failed state.wonder that the guys who thought that "balance"
 was so important didn't notice that there was a cost
Although you might be able to argue over how fairlyassociated with using the Earth's resources and
the benefits have been spread, there is no denyingservices.
that the world is much better off than it was 60 
years ago. People in the very successful economiesOnce the industrial revolution got into full swing, it
like the US and most of Europe have seen standardsbecame apparent pretty quickly just how damaging
of living soar and even the traditionally poor countriesthe activity was to the environment. Rich people built
now have a burgeoning middle class. There havetheir houses upwind of the smoke-stakes and
been crisis like that of Long Term Capital Assetchanges the cuffs and collars of their shirts before
Management in 1998, the dot com collapse of 2001evening. Around this time in our history the "science"
and, most recently, the global banking crisis of 2008.of economics was newly emerging. Economists noted
They have all been scare moments when the worldthe filth but felt secure enough that the damage
economy seemed on the brink of collapse butwould only be localised and as the Earth was a big
somehow it has survived, pretty much intact.place, they could consider it as an "externality" i.e. it
Or has it?still didn't have to be accounted for. Remember,
 though, that they were working at a time when
Wealth and money are human concepts. No otherthere was still only about a quarter of the number of
animal or plant or fish gives a fig about it. But we useus now. The result has been that today we have a
it as a way to communicate. Get enough wealth andglobal system that is focused on making a product
you get a lot of power, influence and "friends".and getting it to a customer as quickly and cheaply
Wealth is not entirely intangible, of course. Itas possible, without considering much else. A global
originated from using energy to extract minerals andsystem that has brought us, for a while, better life
other material from the Earth, use more energy toexpectancy, better health, more comfort and more
shape it into something desirable, some more energyconvenience than the species has ever known. But
to ship it somewhere for someone to buy it, use itthe underlying flaw has now been exposed. Although
for a while then throw it away. Over the past fewthe theories are over 100 years old, we now know
years, we have started to consider knowledge andthat nature is not an abundant "mother" always
ideas as wealth as well but the physical economy isfertile and able to replenish with fault. In the past 50
still the key.years we have come to know the delicacy,
We know we have wealth because our accountantscomplexity and interconnectedness of the natural
tell us that we do, in the form of assets or cashsystems and just how vulnerable to damage they
(money). Accountants are generally good people andare. For the first time we can see that future
when they are compiling the accounts we expectgenerations will be poorer and worse off than we
them to gather information and report it objectivelyare now.
so that third-parties who must rely on it can be sure 
there is no bias or inconsistency, whether deliberateHow we choose to deal with this is, I believe, a
or not. So that everyone is clear about what thisdefining issue for humans. The reaction from some
means, each country has its own Generally Acceptedquarters has been to say, we need to stop economic
Accounting Principles (GAAP), which lays down theactivity. We need to go back to a simpler life.
standards and guidelines for how the informationNeedless to say, this has been a minority view. But
should be gathered and assembled. (There is also anwe do need to find another way.
International GAAP, which as you imagine is pretty 
complicated and one guide to it runs to 3,800 pages.)In the same way as there is a principle of prudence,
Accounting is based on a series of principles andthere is also a Principle of Full Disclosure whereall
there are two, in particular, that are worth thinkinginformation and values about the financial position of
about. The first is the Principle of prudence. Thisa business must be disclosed in the records. There
principle aims at showing the financial reality "as is":are already a number of campaigns to extend this
one should not try to make things look prettier thanprinciple to include disclosure on the environmental
they are. This means that a revenue item should beimpacts of a business. That would certainly help; the
recorded only when it is certain and a provisionresources and services of the planet aren't really
should be entered for an expense which is probable.free. But the full solution needs a fundamental rethink
But is accounting really giving us the true picture ofon how we account for our activity so that we are
the world "as is"?rewarded for replenishing the environment rather
 than destroying it. As soon as people can make
Let's consider for a moment just what our economicmoney from nourishing natural systems, business and
activity really entails. How about the millions of tonsthe economy will deliver.  Because if you really want
of toxic material that it pumps into the air, water andto know how to solve the problems of pollution and
soil every year? How about the gigantic amount ofdevelop solutions to climate change; it's the economy,
waste we produce and, mainly, dump into a holestupid.