Global Warming's Fever

"The earth has a fever." This was a statement frombe collected from multiple climate environments to
Nobel Prize winning documentarian, Al Gore.assess the actual temperature variances. This is
Increasingly the view of mankind by mankind is thatsomething that has not been factored into the
of intruder. In many ways it would seem that we arecurrent Global warming theory.
the earth's enemy and our very existence isIn was noted in 2007 that efforts in the UK to
depleting the earth of resources that could keep anreduce the impact of their human population on the
environmental balance.environment did essentially nothing to actually help in
Global warming is the belief that the temperature ofthe effort. For every action there is an equal and
the air nearest to earth is consistently rising. Droughtsopposite reaction - we've all heard that before. The
are blamed on global warming and new products are'action' was regulation to effect a positive change in
constantly being developed to help lessen humanCO2 emissions. The 'reaction' was no change in spite
impact on perceived climate change.of increased man-hours, new regulations and general
Electric or hybrid cars are thought to provide thecompliance.
best example of how we can reduce carbonWould further restrictions stunt technological
emissions that are said to be harming the earth.advances? There are those who believe global
Every day children are learning about global warmingwarming is much ado about nothing and remain
in school and some are even taking their parents toalarmed that so many changes are being enacted
task for habits that may not be viewed asbased on a theory with no long-term supporting data.
earth-friendly.They are also alarmed that the regulations that are
Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) were slowly eliminatedalready in place are having very little impact on a
when it was discovered that chlorine in this commonperceived problem.
chemical compound might be responsible for ozoneAdd to that the fact that 2007 was the coldest year
depletion in the 1970s. That in turn caused many toon record for the 21st century and you can see why
believe the hole in the ozone was causing the earthsome believe that the term 'fever' might have been
to warm substantially. Obviously global warmingused prematurely. Some may even wonder if man
sounds a clarion call to environmentalist, but politicianshas less control over environmental change than we
and the education establishment have also embracedwould like to believe.
it.I'm certainly not advocating that we act irresponsibly
Research tends to support the idea that humanswith our natural resources, but from a scientific point
have less to do with climate change than livestockof view it is irresponsible to extrapolate an extremely
and other animals, yet this is rarely discussed in thecostly plan of action from data that does not
global warming debate. You should know there aresupport the action.
those that believe the theory of global warming mayFrom a logical point of view it makes perfect sense
be less dramatic than the aforementioned fever.to replace deforested land with new plant life that
For instance there is no hard scientific data tocan convert CO2 to oxygen. It makes sense from an
indicate a long-term warming trend. Where someeconomic point of view to decrease gas consumption
would espouse the belief that oceans will riseas gas prices rise. From a health perspective it makes
dramatically as icebergs melt the actual short-termsense to reduce emissions to assist in the decrease
data indicates an air temperature increase of lessof health issues. However, when the data doesn't
than a degree.support the theory it is either time to adopt a new
Additionally there are those who would request datatheory or at the very least face the facts.