Is the US Being Governed by Ouzelum Birds?

Frankly, I'm getting tired of having to write about thethat was just published by NOAA (the National
global climate situation from the perspective ofOceanic and Atmospheric Administration: another
economic expediency. It feels like I'm beating a dyinghotbed of liberalism) in which we learn that the
- if not dead - horse. I can imagine those who agreeSouthwestern US is likely to face even more intense
with me responding with, "Yeah, we know that, howdroughts, while more frequent heavy downpours will
about moving on?" while those who disagree will readaffect other parts of the country (like Iowa). To
the first few sentences (if they can get beyond thequote the report, extreme weather events "are
title) and then moving along to other things in silent -among the most serious challenges to society in
or not-so-silent - disgust. Yet, since I get a lot of mycoping with a changing climate." Of course, the report
inspiration from the news of the day, it feels asalso had the bad taste to link these climatic changes
though climate change and our (lack of) response toto human activities, particularly the release of
it has become too important a topic to leave alone.greenhouse gasses.
We're getting more information almost daily and, forPardon me for asking, but doesn't the fact that 1.2
the most part, the news is not good.million acres of corn are under water (to say nothing
Our Chief Executive just toured Iowa City andof the soybean crop), which represents almost 10%
reported that, "The good news is that the people inof the yield of the entire state of Iowa, have any
Iowa are tough-minded people." That's the goodeconomic impact? Isn't agribusiness also significant in
news? He reassured them that they'll "come backthe nation's commercial interests? So why are so
better." Like the City of New Orleans, perhaps?many people focusing on the cost of reducing
When natural disasters wreak havoc, there's notgreenhouse gas emissions, while not saying anything
really any such thing as 'good news' - at least not forabout the cost to the economy of the natural
the people affected.disasters that this activity is generating? The
I want to ask one modest question. I want to knowconnection seems perfectly clear, yet, even if it isn't
what it's going to cost in clean-up, repairs, alternativeperfectly clear, isn't it worth the risk to take
housing and assistance, and lost income and revenueproactive measures just in case the connection is
from these floods? I keep going back in my mind tothere?
the vitriol that poured out of the members of the USAs a citizen and as a business man, I'm both apalled
Chamber of Commerce in their weekly newsletterand astounded at the depth of our nation's denial.
and commentary when the subject of global climateWhen will our NIMBY ('Not In My Back Yard')
change came up. It seems, according to most ofattitudes change, when the flood waters or sand
these irate members, that scientists anddunes are lapping at our back doors? When we can
environmentalists are deliberately trying to wreak theno longer afford to put food on our tables? When
US economy. They want to stop - ore even reversethe number of bicycles overtake the number of cars
- the human causes of global warming. Of course weon our highways? Or, perhaps, it'll be when we're all
know that all of this talk is merely the liberals' way ofout of business because nobody can afford our
ruining everything. . . . Or do we?goods and services. We seem to be a nation led by
On the other side of the page from theouzelum birds: those are fabulous birds that fly
Commander-in-Chief's comments on the good newsbackwards and thus do not know where they're
in Iowa, there's an article about an 162-page studygoing, but like to know where they've been.