| When presenting a battle plan to the Pentagon the | | | | battle might take place. Real Intel is paramount and |
| presenter must understand that the Pentagon has | | | | Internet based information is as good as hearsay. |
| some of the most advanced war planners in the | | | | And when presenting a battle plan to the Pentagon |
| history of mankind. Most of these Pentagon war | | | | the presenter must have high self-esteem and talk |
| planners have read nearly every book written on | | | | with authority and have lived enough days to have |
| military history and battle tactics. | | | | experienced the reality of life and traveled enough to |
| Most of these war planners have not only been in | | | | know what they're talking about. Some of these old |
| combat in the heat of battle when chaos and | | | | generals, commanders and admirals did not fall off a |
| controversy rule the day, but they have also beaten | | | | turnip truck and you can expect some of their IQs |
| their opponents and enemies whether they were | | | | to be in the neighborhood of 150 plus. |
| actual or war game simulated enemies. | | | | When presenting a battle plan to the Pentagon the |
| Therefore it behooves the presenter to have their | | | | presenter must understand the new paradigm of war |
| facts straight and be able to have contingencies for | | | | in the net centric battle space, as well as being |
| hundreds if not thousands of what if type questions. | | | | versed in guerrilla warfare tactics of Colonel Boyd and |
| The presenter of a battle plan to the Pentagon must | | | | the lessons learned in Iraq. Please consider this in |
| also know their facts and not simply rely on the old | | | | 2006 when presenting your battle plans to United |
| CIA data for the region or country where the future | | | | States Pentagon. |