Scientist Alfred Nobel is Spinning in His Grave - His Prize Awarded For Fact-Faked Ideology!

Have "Global Warming" ideologues caused theof climatology data being doctored or omitted (initially
tarnishing of the once-proud title of "Scientist" - witharticles merely noted that the belief of "proven"
fact-faked data? Has an important science to humanscience was being seriously challenged). Although the
welfare - Climatology - become only a propagandamainstream media and politicians denounced the
tool for liberal extremists to force the US and otherhackers rather than assess the revelations of the
industrialized countries to undergo technologicaldisclosures; subsequently more information was made
"greening" restrictions and pay exorbitant emissionavailable from previously involved climatologists,
reparations for "destroying the planet"? Is thisdivulging more and more damaging revelations - it
global-warming movement rooted less in unemotionalnow appears strongly that "With so much smoke,
science than in the uneasy consciences of liberalshow can there not be fire?"
about industrial development and capitalism? Is thereRising sea level - Climate change advocates like Al
solid scientific proof of both: climate change andGore or IPCC members have warned that the
man-causation? What is the scientific base for thismelting ice packs are causing sea levels across the
near-universal conventional wisdom?globe to rise - at a rate that will eventually doom us
The progress in science and technology - which hasall. But this is disputed by Swedish paleogeophysicist
advanced humanity from hunter-gathererNils-Axel Mörner, who has been studying sea level
cave-dwelling to space travel and unbelievable plentydata for four decades - claiming that scientists
for almost everyone - is now under threat ofworking for the IPCC have falsified data and
reversal by guilt-obsessed liberal ideologues, dictatingdestroyed evidence to incorrectly prove their political
a collective conscience of culpability for claimedviewpoint. Mörner was recently interviewed by
depletion of Arctic ice packs. Their agenda, withGregory Murphy of Executive Intelligence Review,
zealot sincerity, seems to be a forcing function forstating that the sea level claims made by the IPCC
industrial countries, primarily the US, to place limits andare nonsense: "[W]e can see that the sea level was
restraints on energy usage, and to force paymentsindeed rising, from, let us say, 1850 to 1930-40. And
of huge financial emission-penalties - purely on thethat rise had a rate in the order of 1 millimeter per
basis of a theory of global warming and climateyear - not more. 1.1 is the exact figure. And we can
change. By subtle and progressive inducements -check that, because Holland is a subsiding area; it has
through prestigious United Nations acclamation andbeen subsiding for many millions of years; and
publication of supportive analyses - climatologySweden, after the last Ice Age, was uplifted. That
"scientists" during the past few decades haveended in 1940, and there had been no rise until 1970;
seemingly been gradually seduced and induced to firstand then we can go to satellite altimetry."
overlook, then to manipulate climate data. ThisProjected date of melting of Himalayan glaciers, 2035
apparently was done in the belief that global warmingin place of 2350 - A paragraph in the 2007 Working
and man-made climate change were factual - and soGroup II report ("Impacts, Adaptation and
political leaders in the US and the UN could claim thatVulnerability"), included a projection, "Glaciers in the
it was proven science (An Inconvenient Truth - saysHimalaya are receding faster than in any other part
the Al Gore Nobel Prize-winning film).of the world (see Table 10.9) and if the present rate
It began simply - Rachel Carson wrote a book incontinues, the likelihood of them disappearing by the
1962, "Silent Spring" - credited with launchingyear 2035, and perhaps sooner, is very high if the
environmental concerns - going well beyondEarth keeps warming at the current rate."
"Endangered Species" movements by establishing theThe "hockey stick" graph - The UN's Third
belief that humans were despoiling planet Earth (e.g.Asessment Report prominently featured a graph
DDT poisoning). The slightest apparent indication bylabeled "Millennial Northern Hemisphere Temperature
interpretation of climatology data, that technologyReconstruction" from a paper by Michael E. Mann,
was adversely impacting our planet - was seizedRaymond S. Bradley and Malcolm K. Hughes, often
upon politically: objective to restrain the causativereferred to as the "Hockey Stick Graph". This graph
technology (that had achieved so much for thediffered from a schematic in the first assessment
universal benefits of civilization itself). To areport which depicted larger global temperature
fair-minded public, if "Science" said so (Science beingvariations over the past 1000 years, and higher
considered infallible), then our responsibility should nottemperatures during the Medieval Warm Period than
be shirked. Once the United Nations was established,the present day. (The schematic was not an actual
with its universal prestige, the process wasplot of data.) The appearance in the TAR was widely
unstoppable. An IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel onconstrued as demonstrating that the current warming
Climate Change - was established in 1988 (the titleperiod is exceptional in comparison to temperatures
itself makes clear - the purpose was not scientificbetween 1000 and 1900. The methodology used to
inquiry, but validation and confirmation of anproduce this graph was criticized in an article by
established conclusion) - annual scientific papersStephen McIntyre and Ross McKitrick. In a 2006
sought, published and honored in the most prestigiousletter to Nature, Bradley, Hughes and Mann pointed
of journals. No climatologist could resist.out that their original article had said that "more
The first international conference, the Kyoto Protocolwidespread high-resolution data are needed before
was convened in 1997 in Kyoto, Japan, the statedmore confident conclusions can be reached" and that
goal being to combat global warming - the wordsthe uncertainties were "the point of the article." In his
were clear, "stabilization of greenhouse gas2009 book The Real Global Warming Disaster,
concentrations in the atmosphere [to] preventChristopher Booker provides a detailed account of
dangerous anthropogenic interference with thehow the graph came to being prominently featured in
climate system". The prevailing international opinionthe IPCC's Third Assessment Report.
dominating Kyoto was that human activities haveClimategate-U-turn, hockey-stick data lost -
resulted in substantial global warming since theColleagues say that the reason Professor Phil Jones
mid-20th century, and that continued growth inhas refused Freedom of Information requests is that
greenhouse gas concentrations - caused byhis record keeping is "not as good as it should be".
human-induced emissions - would generate high risksThe data is crucial to the famous hockey stick graph
of dangerous climate changes to planet Earth. Underused by climate change advocates to support the
the Protocol provisions, thirty-seven industrializedtheory. Professor Jones has been in the spotlight
countries would commit themselves to a reduction ofsince he stepped down as director of the University
four greenhouse gases, including carbon dioxide, andof East Anglia's Climatic Research Unit after the
two groups of gases produced by industrializedleaking of emails that sceptics claim show scientists
nations, the benchmark being emission levels of 1990.were manipulating data. The raw data, collected from
Incorporated in the Protocol were complexity factorshundreds of weather stations around the world and
of "flexible mechanisms", permitting emission tradinganalysed by his unit, has been used for years to
and credits through financial exchanges. The majorbolster efforts by the United Nation's
countries (Annex I) were required to submit annualIntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to press
reports of all anthropogenic greenhouse gasgovernments to cut carbon dioxide emissions. Dr
emissions. Noteworthy under the Protocol (with aBenny Pieser, director of the skeptical Global
"designated national authority"), a degree ofWarming Policy Foundation, said Professor Jones's
sovereignty is clearly being transferred from individual'excuses' for his failure to share data were hollow, as
countries to the UN organization - in areas ofhe had shared it with colleagues and 'mates'.
significant import to national productivity and finance.Climategate-U-turn, admissions - Professor Jones also
The objective of the Kyoto and Copenhagenconceded the possibility that the world was warmer
conferences was clearly to establish a legally bindingin medieval times than now - suggesting global
Protocol, an international agreement, whereby all thewarming may not be a man-made phenomenon. He
participating nations committed themselves to tacklingalso said that for the past 15 years there has been
the issue of global warming. The Protocol alsono 'statistically significant' warming.
reaffirms the principle that developed countries haveObama's EPA Emission Control - Coinciding with the
to pay billions of dollars in emission reparations.first day of the international climate summit in
As of November 2009, 186 countries have ratifiedCopenhagen, the Obama Environmental Protection
the agreement, the most notable exception beingAgency's actions were seemingly to reassure
the US (deemed responsible for 36.1% of the 1990delegates that the United States is committed to
emission levels of Annex I countries). Although areducing its emissions; the EPA said that six gases,
signatory to the Kyoto Protocol, the US has neitherincluding carbon dioxide and methane, pose a danger
ratified nor withdrawn from the Protocol. The Climateto the environment and the health of Americans and
Control Act of 2007, more commonly referred to inthat the agency would start drawing up regulations
the U.S. as the "Cap and Trade Bill" was proposed forto reduce those emissions. The EPA's decision paves
greater U.S. alignment with the Kyoto standards andthe way for the agency to regulate carbon-dioxide
goals; it has been passed by the House - resistance isemissions from sources such as power plants and
by Republicans and growing in the Senate amongfactories. The EPA's finding stems from a 2007
some Democrats. At the end of 2008, China hadSupreme Court ruling that said the government could
surpassed the United States as the biggest emitterrestrict heat-trapping gases under the Clean Air Act if
of CO2 from power generation.it found them a danger to the public health and
On 25 July 1997, before the Kyoto Protocol waswelfare. A realistic question is whether CO2 should be
finalized, the U.S. Senate unanimously passed (by 95-0included as a danger to public health, since more CO2
vote) that the United States should not be ameans lusher plant growth. The number of
signatory to any protocol that did not include bindingbusinesses requiring an EPA permit would jump from
targets and timetables for developing, as well as forthe current 12,000-13,000 to more than a million; not
industrialized nations - noting that its passage "couldonly schools and hospitals, but offices, apartment
result in serious harm to the economy of the Unitedbuildings, even bakeries. Estimates of cost to the US
States". President George W. Bush withheld theeconomy are $7 trillion when fully implemented in
treaty from Senate ratification because of the strain2029.
he believed the treaty would place on the USObama's EPA Emission Control, reactions - Reacting
economy; he also emphasized the scientificto EPA, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, USA's
uncertainties which he believed existed in thelargest business-lobbying group, is asking a federal
technical evidence.court to review the Obama administration's decision
In 2007, the Nobel Prize committee awarded theto declare greenhouse gases a health risk under the
Nobel Prize for Peace jointly to the United Nation'sClean Air Act. The Chamber's petition, filed with the
IPCC (International Panel for Climate Change) and toU.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, challenges the
Ex-Vice President Al Gore, for his film "TheEnvironmental Protection Agency's ruling made in
Inconvenient Truth". The words justifying the awardDecember. Senator Murkowski, an Alaska Republican,
were: "for their efforts to build up and disseminateis also leading an effort in Congress to stop the EPA
greater knowledge about man-made climate change,from regulating greenhouse gases; three Democrats
and to lay the foundations for the measures that areare joining his cause.
needed to counteract such change."As the foundation of the claimed scientific data
Newly elected President Obama, in his speech at the(purportedly proving global warming) begins to
Copenhagen conference - to the assembled leaderscrumble, as the detailed tapestry (which painted a
from nations around the world - gave a ringingpicture of man-caused climate change) begins to
endorsement to the Climate Change theory: "Weunravel - with steady and progressive new
come together here in Copenhagen because climatedisclosures: more emails, UN climatologist resignations,
change poses a grave and growing danger to ouradmissions of flawed information, claims of data lost,
people. You would not be here unless you - like me -etc. (and as the evidence of Mother Nature's
were convinced that this danger is real. This is notextreme wintry weather in the 2009-10 season
fiction, this is science. Unchecked, climate change willmakes a mockery of global warming fears) - it
pose unacceptable risks to our security, ourappears that many world-renowned personalities and
economies, and our planet. That much we know. Asorganizations have painted themselves into an
the world's largest economy and the world's secondideological corner: the Nobel Prize Committee, the
largest emitter, America bears our share ofUnited Nations International Panel on Climate Change,
responsibility in addressing climate change, and weAl Gore, plus the (mostly Democrat) liberals in
intend to meet that responsibility. That is why weCongress - and also President Obama.
have renewed our leadership within internationalHowever the situation will eventually play out, the
climate negotiations, and worked with other nationsconsequences will be enormous: either exorbitant
to phase out fossil fuel subsidies. And that is why wecosts in lost US jobs through reduced industrial
have taken bold action at home - pursuingefficiencies (due to emission penalties of Obama's
comprehensive legislation to transform to a cleanEPA and/or Cap-and-Trade Bill), plus (for the US,
energy economy." He also committed: "I'm confidentpaying most of) $100 billion per year as reparation
that America will fulfill the commitments that wepayments to 3rd world countries (Kyoto and
have made: cutting our emissions in the range of 17Copenhagen Conferences) - or instead, mass
percent by 2020, and by more than 80 percent byadmission to having been wrong on global warming,
2050." In the area of financial commitments, "Americawith embarrassing political egg-on-their-faces re
will be a part of fast-start funding that will ramp upshameful concessions of believing punk-science and
to $10 billion in 2012. And we will engage in a globaltaking the US to the-near-brink of economic disaster!
effort to mobilize $100 billion in financing by 2020."Many voices are even now being heard calling for the
Thus, all the world leaders seem to be strongNobel Prize Committee to revoke the awards given
believers in global warming, and climate changeto Al Gore and the UN IPCC. Will Climategate
caused by industrial emissions - however, what aremushroom into a "Waterloo" type-event for
the true scientific facts?President Obama and maybe even the United
The leaked emails from one of the UN'sNations? The stakes are high - how will it play out?
data-gathering sites drew attention to the possibility