Should A Global Climate Agreement Hold The US To A Higher Environmental Standard

Yes, the US should be held to a higher environmentalsuggested Green Budget, but one would suspect
standard than the rest of the world. We havethat the Green Budget is closer to our needs if we
benefited from a superior economic growth poweredwish to assume a leadership role in environmental
by consumption of a major share of the world's fossilstandards.
fuels, causing a major share of the world'sClimate change is the major issue within the Congress
environmental pollution. We are technically equippedand should present a major showdown on the
to lead toward a higher environmental standard.proposed energy budget. Democrats and Republicans
Currently, however, it would be a major challenge forin both the House and Senate are drafting major bills
the US to assume this leadership role. We will have toto reduce greenhouse gas emission through "cap and
wait for a new administration that, hopefully, willtrade" systems. These bills would make billions of
want this role for us.dollars to stimulate development of cleaner energy
The Bush administration has continued to rejectsources. The major presidential contenders for the
actions to reduce global warming pollution. It hasupcoming election, Democratic Senators Clinton and
refused to require cuts in heat-trapping carbonObama and Republican Senator McCain, also support
dioxide pollution, significantly raise fuel economythe "cap and trade" systems. In addition, Senator
requirements, or hold companies accountable forClinton wants to tighten fuel economy standards
improving their energy efficiency using wind, solar andmore than Congress did last year so that an average
other renewable energy sources. In his final FY2009vehicle will go 55 miles per gallon by 2030. Senator
budget request, President Bush accurately reflectedMcCain sees nuclear power as a big part of the
his administration's low priority for environmental help.environmental pollution solution.
Again, President Bush stripped critical funds protectingAggressive environmental leadership should emerge
America's communities and natural resources, andfrom the upcoming Presidential election. However, it
instead rewarded dirty industries. All of this followedwill take the strong and concerted efforts of the
his State of the Union Address touting hisfuture President and Congress to move the USA to
commitment to advance clean, renewable resourcesthe forefront of environmental standards. There is a
and reduce dependence on oil. A quote fromgreat watershed between the mainstream
President Bush' speech on energy was "The Unitedtechnologies that make up the modern energy
States is committed to strengthening our energyindustry and the newer "clean" technologies that
security and confronting global climate change. Andoffer an alternative, low carbon path to the future.
the best way to meet these goals is for America toThis watershed encompasses costs, technology,
continue leading the way toward the development ofmaturity and scale of existing energy infrastructure.
cleaner and more energy-efficient technology".It is not enough to ask our new president to lead us
Despite the president's more aggressive statementsinto a new role of energy leadership. With today's
on fighting climate change, his budget request wouldknown conditions, there are two immediate future
reduce funding for energy efficiency and renewablemajor hurdles that will have to be overcome to
energy such as wind, solar, etc. The president getscontinue to a leadership role. The first hurdle is the
much of that reduction by slashing funding from $280slowing of the US economy. We suspect that the
million to $60 million for low-income households toeconomy will slow and possibly go into recession in
"weatherize" their homes with new windows, betterlate 2008 and 2009. This poor economy could slow
insulation and other efforts.investments into renewable energies and postpone
As a frame of reference, the Green Budget, which isthe momentum that the US currently has in adopting
used in Congress' budget deliberations, recommendsrenewable energy.
a FY2009 Weatherization budget of $300 millionThe second hurdle is congress' failure to renew
dollars. On average, the Department of Energy hasenergy-incentive tax credits that lapse at the end of
stated that weatherization reduces heating bills by 312008. A new economic study by Navigant Consulting
percent and overall energy bills by $358 per year.finds that over 116,000 US jobs and nearly $19 billion
The total 2009 request for Office of Energyin US investments could be lost in just one year if
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, a majorenergy tax credits are not renewed by Congress.
Department of Energy agency, is $1.255 billion, a 27It is a full agenda for a new President just to position
percent cut from the 2008 level of $1.722 billion. Thethe United States to account for and reduce its own
Green Budget recommendation for the Office ofenvironmental pollution. To achieve a leadership role
Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy is $81 Billionwould be a great accomplishment and one that I
Dollars. One would anticipate major differenceshope that we will witness.
between the President's requested budget and the