Sustainability - Governmental Denial

"Scientists and economists have been offered- Oil spills into sea - at least 6 million barrels of oil
$10,000 each by a lobby group funded by one of theleaked into sea causing largest ever oil slick -
world's largest oil companies to undermine a majordevastated local bird, mammal, fish populations -
climate change report due to be published today."prawn fisheries decimated
recorded Ian Sample, science correspondent at- Landmines and other UXO, eg cluster bombs - 1.6
Guardian in his report dated Friday February 2, 2007.million landmines laid by Iraqi forces in Kuwait; approx
"Letters sent by the American Enterprise Institute5% of bombs do not explode on impact (higher % in
(AEI), an Exxon Mobil-funded think-tank with closedesert) - many people killed/ injuries
links to the US Federal administration, offered the- Depleted Uranium (DU) - super-dense metal used in
payments for articles that emphasize thearmour piercing weapons - approx 290 tonnes spread
shortcomings of a report from the UN'sacross Gulf - source of low-level radioactivity and
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).toxicity
Travel expenses and additional payments were also- Damage to desert ecology - obvious bomb
offered", he continued.damage, but also movements of armoured vehicles
By the by, the UN report was written by internationalbroke up fragile soil surface - approx 50% of
experts and is widely regarded as the mostKuwait's land area damaged
comprehensive review yet of climate change science.References: UNEP (2003); Additional info from: New
On September 19th 2006, Rep. Henry WaxmanScientist (2003); Friends of the Earth (2003); Medact
(D-CA), ranking member on the Government Reform(2002)
Committee, has just released a series of emails fromBesides, the following figures will give you a better
the Department of Commerce that suggest thatinsight as to what armed conflict between
Bush officials "tried to suppress a federal scientistgovernments has and can do to this earth,
from discussing the link between global warming and- Oil consumption by military forces
hurricanes" In a letter to Commerce Secretary Carlos- USA - 133 million barrels in 2005
Gutierrez, Waxman details how CNBC requested an- 2% of total USA oil consumption
interview with NOAA scientist Tom Knutson in- similar to Sweden's total consumption
October 2005 -- one month after Hurricane Katrina --- only 2 out of 56 African countries consume more oil
"to discuss whether global warming is contributing tothan US military
the number or intensity of hurricanes."- true figure could be as much as double due to
I mean, whom are we kidding by doing all this?accounting errors overseas
None but ourselves. Just for a moment, let us forgetUK - 7 million barrels in 2004
about everyone else in this world. How much more- 1% of total UK oil consumption
does it require to state, masking the truth is only- similar to Namibia's total consumption
going to kill you, your living parents, children, grandEmissions of CO2 from military forces
children, and everyone and anyone you hold near and- USA - ~60Mt in 2005
dear to you, enough to care about.- 1% of total USA emissions
We are all partners in default, within the process of- similar to Finland's total emissions
global warming. The Governments responsible should- UK - ~5Mt in 2005
realize that, our unsustainable practices are part and- 1% of total UK emissions
parcel of our daily lives. But we ought to know this- similar to Senegal's total emissions
fact, that in the absence of some decisive measuresLarge military forces are making a significant
on our part, the true cost of our actions will be bornecontribution to the depletion of oil resources and to
by our own succeeding generations, even startingclimate change - both are likely to increase the risk of
with ours. As the U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moonconflict which military forces are claimed to be there
advices, "That would be an unconscionable legacy;to prevent!
one which we must all join hands to avert. As itClimate change could increase the risk of conflict,
stands, the damage already inflicted on ourespecially in developing countries:
ecosystem will take decades, perhaps centuries, to- Water shortages will increase with rising
reverse, if we act now."temperatures (and with population increases) -
Effect of War on the Environment:number of people living in "water-stressed" areas
Dr Stuart Parkinson. Executive Director, Scientists forexpected to rise from 1.7 billion in 2000 to 5 billion in
Global Responsibility (SGR), analyzed the relationship2025
between war and environment extremely well.- Sea-level rise and increased storminess will increase
We all have to agree to three basic truths.risk of flood damage, especially to heavily populated
- Environmental Resources are one of the primarycoastal areas - tens of millions more people are likely
causes of War and Conflictto be affected by 2080s
- War and Conflict, in turn causes Environmental- Disruption to agriculture is likely
Pollution hindering Sustainability.- Together these factors could lead to a large
- Lack of sustainability creates strain onincrease in numbers of "environmental refugees"
Environmental Resources, leading to war and conflict,References: Military consumption/ CO2 emissions
to gain access to scarce resources. This is a cyclicalfigures estimated by SGR based data from DESC
process, one causing the other, and in turn leading to(2006) & MoD (2006). Additional info from: IPCC
the extinction of every perceivable living being on(2001), Karbuz (2006), UNEP (2007)
earth.Bottom-line:
To analyze how environment influences Conflict/War,It is one thing to know the facts as above and
and how that in turn affects Sustainability, let us gorecognize the truth that "what we are doing is
through the following truths:wrong". Every Government, and every military
- The 1960s saw the peak of new oil reserves. Thecorporation, need to just not recognize the damage
Association for Study of Peak Oil & Gas (ASPO)they are doing to this world. They need to accept
argues that the peak of annual production will occurresponsibility. Continuos censorship of the truth, will
within the next few years (or has possibly justonly push the truth further away, and draw
occurred), with global demand exceeding productiondestruction of this world closer.
soon after. Prices are likely to quickly rise, and theThe government can do a lot of things to make
current price shocks are merely early indication ofthings right, and ensure Sustainability. For starters,
that.they can reduce consumption of fossil fuels,
- Whatever global oil reserves remain, they areespecially oil, and execute and just not lay down
concentrated in small areas - eg Middle East statespolicies and measures to support changes, as
that hold 65% of reserves - though there is growingeco-taxes, carbon trading, regulation, R&D
concern that they have exaggerated the size of theirsupport etc. The UN Framework Convention on
reserves.Climate Change can be strengthened, especially
- Domestic consumption far exceeding domesticbinding targets on the biggest emitters (the largest
production in most major countriesbeing the USA) based on "Contraction and
- Projected growth in consumption is hugeConvergence" principles. Global flow of small weapons
- With the oil supply concentrated in a politicallyto poorer countries can be stemmed, since their
unstable region of the world and the possibility ofenvironmental resources are already under stress and
demand exceeding supply in the near future -hence conflict is bound to occur. This can be done by
economic problems are likely, increasing the possibilitystrengthening of UN program of action on eradicating
of conflict.illegal small arms, having every country agree a UN
- We urgently need to move away from our higharms trade treaty. USA, which has highest levels of
dependence on oil - even President George W. Bushsmall arms in private hands and is world's largest arms
has acknowledged the need to break "the oilexporter, is resisting these efforts. Another great
addiction" in his 2006 and 2007 State of the Unioneffort every government can take, is reduce
addressesdependence on military forces as a way of dealing
References: Energy Information Administrationwith international problems. This will also help reduce
(2006); ASPO (2006); Nur (2006); Wikipedia (2007b);their carbon emissions!
The White House (2007)The first step to Sustainability, needs to be
Now let us perceive what war/conflict does to theacceptance...acceptance of the responsibility of such
environment:ensuing catastrophe, following the current trends of
During the 1991 Gulf War:Military action and governmental Denials. The power
- Oil well fires - more than 600 wells set ablaze, someof corporations, especially military corporations, with
burning for 9 months - smoke blocked sun -their ability to lobby for favorable policies needs to
temperature fell by 10C; approx 1000 people diedbe curbed. Denial is merely cheating oneself, and
due to acrid smoke; 300 million tonnes CO2 releasedcheating the world; though the truth still remains.
contributing to climate changeGovernments and Military corporations need to ask
- Oil polluted groundwater - 60 million barrels leakedthemselves: "Can we live with the truth, that we
into ground poisoning 40% of groundwater (Kuwaithave destroyed the world?
has less water per head than any other country)