The Future of Emissions Tracking and How It Affects You

When I was an Energy Analyst at JCI, mythat climate change just happens, and we are
conscience was always reassured that I was doingentering a period of greater climate change activity,
good work by being involved in saving energy andwhich, in this instance has little to do with human
natural resources. When I explained at a party what Iactivity.
did for money, people always approved. It wasIn any case, the Kyoto Protocol, the Clean Air Act
almost as popular as being in the solar energy or windand tough EPA standards have begun to put into
power business. However, as soon as I opened myplace governmental controls limiting the burning of
mouth, their eyes glazed over and they started tofossil fuels. In many areas of the country those who
drift away to the more colorful figures in the room,surpass their emissions quota are paying steep fines.
because, you know, nobody wants to know moreThe Extent of Emissions Monitoring Today and in the
than a sentence or two about our field.Near Future
One of the benefits of saving energy is that we areEmissions monitoring has become commonplace in
at the same time increasing our air quality, and manyboth the Utility and the Commercial and Industrial
believe that we may be putting off global warming atSector. Approximately 35 states have state-wide
the same time. I always wanted to quantify thepermit programs for air pollution. Under the Clean Air
reduction in emissions associated with the reduction inAct, permits are issued by states or, when a state
energy use. It would make the customer and I feel afails to carry out the Clean Air Act satisfactorily, by
little better about our jobs. But, as we were alwaysthe EPA. In some areas (deemed "non-attainment
busy putting out fires here and there, I never got aareas"), the EPA has set limits on NOx, SOx and/or
chance. When I worked at SRC Systems (theVOCs.
creator of Metrix), some Metrix users suggested thatThe Supreme Court recently ruled favorably on an
we insert an emissions module into Metrix so thatEPA request on cleaner air standards. This will directly
they could see savings in energy, dollars, and tons ofaffect anything that burns gas, coal or oil. We are
pollutants. I thought that this was a fantastic idea,now in the 3-5 year period in which these new rules
but we just never found the time to get it done.that will be implemented. What will happen is that
Well, finally, we, at Abraxas Energy Consulting havesome locales' status will change from attainment
created the tool, which you can find at You can(meeting clean air standards) to non-attainment (not
enter kWh in monthly or annual periods and get backmeeting clean air standards, and permitting required).
a nice report showing tons (or pounds) of CO2, CO,When new areas become non-attainment areas,
NOx, SO2, VOCs, PM10 and Mercury. For example,industry in that area will be forced to track emissions.
Metrix users might want to enter Baseline and ActualIt is suspected by many that in the future, CO2
kWh. The tool is free, and I hope you will use it. It isemissions limits will also be enforced. (This is more
there for you.likely in Europe than in the United States.) If CO2
What follows is some background on emissions,limits are enforced, then the impact of CO2
emissions monitoring and tracking, in case you wantstandards has the potential to dramatically affect
to sound intelligent when talking to your customer orenergy usage decisions.
boss.However on the other hand, nobody believes that
Backgroundthe United States Congress will ratify the Kyoto
To start with, emissions can be grouped into twoTreaty (which limits CO2 emissions). Many believe
major areas of concern:that the Kyoto Treaty would make CO2 abatement
Those emissions that pollute the air, cause acid rain,needlessly expensive, and there are others who
and kill wildlife and older people (CO, NOx, SO2,believe global warming has little to do with human
VOCs, PM10, Mercury and others), andactivity anyway.
Greenhouse Gases that may lead to global warmingEstimating Air Emissions for Fossil Fuels and Stored
(CO2, water vapor, methane and others).Materials
The Clean Air Act and tough EPA standards haveThe only emissions monitored are those associated
done much to reduce air pollution in US cities. It iswith the burning of fossil fuels and the storage of
said that the air in Los Angeles is cleaner today thansome materials which generate toxic emissions. kWh
it was 30 years ago.are not monitored for emissions, and the discussion in
The Future of Emissions Tracking and How Itthis section does not address electricity.
Affects YouThere are three ways to monitor emissions of air
There has been a raging debate over the pastcontaminants:
decade about CO2 emissions and global warming.- Annual or Biannual stack tests. This is a very
During the late 90s, it appeared that the Unitedexpensive option.
States was on the verge of accepting the thesis- Continual Emissions Monitoring systems (CEM
that global warming is due in large part to humansystems). This is also an expensive option.
consumption of fossil fuels and consequent- Parametric Monitoring, also know as AP42. This
production of CO2. The Kyoto Protocol was put intomethod converts fuel and electricity usage into
place to address CO2 emissions. However, the Kyotoemissions amounts using EPA emissions factors. This
Protocol was never ratified by Congress during theis the least expensive and most common method.
Clinton years (neither Democrats or Republicans took- The EPA usually will accept emissions data gathered
a liking to it), nor does it appear that it will ever beusing the AP42 method. However these emissions
ratified in this country. As well, many are now arguingfactors are averages and are based upon older less
that Global Warming may have little to do withefficient equipment and may err on the high side. As
human activity at all. As the Arctic permafrost melts,a result some may choose alternative methods of
more are now arguing that the planet is stilltracking emissions.
recovering from an ice age a thousand years ago,