The importance of Collecting and Flaring Landfill Gas to reduce Global Warming

The importance of Collecting and Burning Landfill Gasproportion of the total CH4 it will collect may be no
to reduce Global Warming - By: Steve Lastmore than 50%, of the total produced over the
Climate change is one of the most seriouslifetime of the landfill.
environmental threats.The Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Joint
At the end of 2005 the United Kingdom’s HadleyImplementation (JI) created by the Kyoto Protocol
Centre announced results of climate modeling whichare project based emission reduction systems and
were described as finally demonstrating beyondoperate under the United Nations Framework
doubt that the generally rising average globalConvention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). These
temperatures seen during the 20th century andmechanisms make it possible to launch LFG utilization
continuing in the first five years of the 21st, areprojects for example in ANNEX I countries and
caused by human activities.purchase Emission Reduction Units (ERU) which are
In fact, they summarized the continuing trendthe CO2 equivalent units.
through 2005 as follows:-So, we have established that one very potent GHG
“2005 has been the warmest year on record foris landfill gas (LFG), due to its high methane (CH4)
the northern hemisphere. The end of November sawcontent. If say, on average, the LFG emitted from a
mean sea and land temperature 0.65 C above thelandfill site comprises half methane and half other
long-term average, while temperatures in thegases, by preventing one unit of LFG emission we will
southern hemisphere were found to be the fourthsave about ten times the equivalent weight in CO2.
warmest on record. The statistics continue theTorch burning (burning in a flare) decreases CH4
recent trend of increasing global temperatures, whichemissions by about 95%, and emissions can be
have seen the ten warmest years all occurring in thereduced even more with energy utilization.
last 11 years and follow various climate changeComparisons between GHG emissions with and
forecasts. "These figures show that global warming iswithout LFG flaring, and with the addition of the
continuing and are consistent with what we expectnecessary infrastructure and generation equipment to
to occur from our research into greenhouse gasproduce power have been carried out using Life
emissions" - commented Adam Scaife, a ClimateCycle Assessment methods.
Variability scientist at the Met Office Hadley Centre.These studies have also examined the financial
In the UK, the Central England Temperature (CET)profitability of LFG utilization projects with different
for 2005 was 1.07 C above normal and within the topCO2 emission costs. In both instances very big
ten warmest years ever.” Ref: UK Meteorologicalreductions in GHG emissions can be achieved, but the
Office, Hadley Centre and the University of Eastbalance becomes especially favourable when the CO2
Anglia.emissions saved by replacing power which would
There is no doubt that the threat to our environmenthave otherwise been generated by non-renewable
is real, and that we must act to limit the damage,(usually fossil, fuels) are considered. Profitability for
and that there will be great economic and socialmost schemes has also been reported to be good
damage as well.under current market values for the Carbon Credits
Many governments have ratified the Kyoto Protocol,allocated.
the purpose of which is to reduce greenhouse gasMethane is a relatively clean fuel and its use produces
(GHG) emissions, and to begin to limit the greenhousefar less sulfur dioxide than burning coal. So
severity of the effect.substituting LFG utilization energy for fossil fuels
The many signatory nations are committed togenerated energy, also reduces other emissions in
reducing GHG emissions to the level of 1990, andmost cases.
collectively a reduction in 5.2% has been agreed byIn the United Kingdom, in common with many other
2012. It has taken until 2005 for the negotiations toEU countries, most of our landfills (and all of the large
be completed, but now in early 2006 the agreementsemitting landfills) already have landfill gas collection and
are in-place, and there has been 9 months offlaring systems installed as required by our
Emissions Trading.Environment Agency. This means that the most likely
This means that a lot of uncertainties have beenmanner in which countries like the UK can encourage
removed, and we can begin to look at the methodsand make use of the provision of landfill Energy from
which can now be adopted to bring those benefitsWaste (EfW) will be by emission trading between the
which can be achieved by Kyoto into reality.developed and the developing nations, as set up by
Make no mistake about it. There is a huge taskthe Kyoto agreement.
ahead. GHG emissions monitored in the form of globalEMISSION TRADING
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions have continued risingIn 1992 the United Nations Framework Convention on
inexorably since 1990, and in 2003, global emissionsClimate Change (UNFCCC) was accepted. It defined
were about 15 million tonnes greater than in 1990 [1].the framework for international climate policy and 188
According to forecasts of authorities, the amount ofcountries have ratified it. The Framework came into
GHG emissions will continue to grow in most nations,force in 1994 for all the nations which were then
and additional measures will be necessary to achievesignatories. The main goal of the Framework is to
the reversion to 1990 levels.begin to tackle the challenges posed by climate
In many EU Countries, and other developedchange. On 11th December 1997, a number of
countries, various fiscal measures have alreadygovernments first adopted the Kyoto Protocol, which
implemented. There are many further financiallysets legally binding limits to GHG emissions in industrial
reasonable measures to save energy and to improvecountries, and Emissions Trading has been an integral
energy efficiency, which are being progressivelypart of the protocol throughout.
implemented in the Kyoto member states.The EU has drawn up a scheme for GHG emission
However, the demands of society continue towardallowance trading, and this is implemented at
greater affluence and energy use, even in thecompany level within industry. An “allowance”
developed Kyoto signatory countries energy usemeans an allowance to emit one tonne of carbon
continues to rise, despite the 20% increase in energydioxide, or an equivalent in methane, during a
costs experienced in 2005, throughout Europe andspecified period [4].
globally.Every EU member state has its own emission level
So, it appears that for most nations, still more actionsreduction target and the competent authorities of
are going to be needed to reach the existingthe member states grant the allowances to
emission reduction target, let alone to provide meanscompanies. EU emission trading is extended beyond
by which, beyond 2012, we can reduce CO2 levelsthe EU by The Clean Development Mechanism and
still further.Joint Implementation.
Let is not forget that after 2012 it will be necessaryPrice of Allowances in the EU Market
to maintain or reduce the 1990 level globally, not let itEmission trading takes place between companies. Any
rise further; not easy given the above average ratecompany is able to buy more allowances if they need
of energy demand from the developing nations.more GHG emission permits than they already have.
We have mentioned already what each developedThe price of emission allowances is just like any
Kyoto nation can, and will, be doing at home. Anothertraded commodity and rises and falls under market
way to reduce national CO2 is purchasing Assignedforces of supply and demand.
Amount Units (AAU) which are the CO2 equivalentBefore GHG emission permits had been granted,
units owned by states which participate in theforecasts for allowance prices varied typically
emission trade mechanism of the Kyoto protocolbetween 5 and 15 Euro/tonne CO2. In early 2005 the
(“Carbon Credits” system). So, purchase ofallowance price was 7.5 Euro/tonne CO2 [5]. After
Carbon Credits is now possible for the developedthat the price started to rise and in July 2005 it had
nations, from the developing nations.risen to 28 Euro/tonne CO2 [5]. In October 2005 the
THE IMPORTANCE OF METHANE AND LANDFILLprice reduced again to 23 Euro/tonne CO2 [6]. The
GAS IN CLIMATE CHANGEvery high price which held through this autumn
Now let’s for a while forget about thesurprised industry, and for many companies it meant
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) CO2, which we haveadditional expenses. However, such a high price is
discussed so far, and think about another gas:very good news for LFG Energy from Waste (EfW)
methane.scheme profitability.
Why methane? Well we should consider methane,It is very difficult to forecast the allowance price,
because it has a global warming effect about 23because there are many factors which have an
times stronger than carbon dioxide (CO2) [2].effect on it. Prices could rise or fall, but most
It has only been fully appreciated within the past 10schemes underway and planned were based upon
years that methane so significant to global warming,the early price forecasts, and now look very
and one place in which large quantities of methaneprofitable.
are being produced by human activity is within landfills.Financial analysts have generally forecast that the
Landfill gas from any modern landfill which was builtprices of EU Allowances could be between 5 and 50
to comply with EU regulations, and all othersEuro/tonne CO2, a very wide range. At the moment
worldwide built to similar principles within the past 20early January 2006, a stable price band appears to
to 25 years, will usually produce an LFG containinghave been reached in the range 20 and 25 Euro
between 40% and 60% of methane.tonne CO2 [6]. (Any potential investor must look at
Therefore, landfills have a major potential to producethe evidence and gain his/her own view.)
a significant GHG impact, indeed the UK DEFRA hasMany governments are concerned about climate
put the UK's landfill gas contrbution at between 17%change because it is now known to be caused by
and 25% of total GHG emissions.human activty and a serious environmental threat.
Landfills without a landfill gas collection system, whichEmission trading, in which CO2 Allocations are
vent freely to the atmosphere, therefore have apurchased from LFG Flaring and EfW Schemes in the
significant and rising influence on the greenhousedeveloping nations is one very environmentally and
effect. Indeed, even for landfills with an effectiveeconomically and socially sound method for reducing
capping and a gas extraction system installed, theGHG emissions and fighting Climate Change.