The Moral Case Against Global Warming Policies

How odd that someone would make a moral caseagainst global warming is the limit of carbon emissions
against global warming. The trend is to promote it asfrom developing nations. People there do not have
a just cause. Global warming is presented as aaccess to electricity, clean running water, or any of
problem that we should be doing all we can to fix orthe luxuries we take for granted. Who are we in the
life as we know it will be no more. The so calleddeveloped world to tell these nations that they must
"science" that supporters of global warming use toadhere to "green" practices when we have built our
justify their position is anything but settled. Newlives on a carbon emitting system? It is immoral to
evidence is constantly being discovered that putsforcibly keep people in poverty because of scientific
bigger and bigger holes in global warming theories--nottheories. We have no right as a person or as a nation
laws, theories. The most ridiculous of these theoriesto tell any other person or nation how to live or run
being that global warming--if it is indeed happening--istheir own country.
caused by human beings.The great ethanol lie is another derivative of global
The objective here is not to go over the sciencewarming. One third of our corn crop in the United
that casts an overwhelming shadow of doubt on theStates this year will be consumed by ethanol
accuracy of global warming theories but, it would beproduction. Sounds like a lot except it will account for
a waste not to share it. Not enough people are3 percent of our total fuel usage while driving up the
aware of this information as it is.price of other grains and food. This reduces the
It is probably safe to say that there is no life on theamount of food we send over to those who are
other planets in our solar system. Most places arestarving. And if you didn't already know, it takes
either too hot, too cold, or lacking an atmosphere likemore fuel to produce and transport ethanol than
ours. Chances are, no aliens are driving carbonethanol can provide. A gigantic losing strategy that
producing SUVs on our neighboring planets. It just soonly makes it harder for Americans to buy food and
happens that Pluto is experiencing warming. Therereduces the supply of food to the starving and
was a storm on Jupiter that scientists believe is dueneedy.
to climate change. Our closest neighbor, Mars, hasThis war on global warming is largely a means to
been experiencing rising temperatures and as a result:steal more money from ordinary folk. The
melting. Either our horrible carbon footprints are sogovernment regulations and subsidies that have
gigantic that it is affecting the entire solar system orsprouted from this war such as carbon taxes and
it's the sun.subsidized initiatives like corn-based ethanol are going
Al Gore's claim to Hollywood trophies and a Nobelto make us all poorer. The carbon tax is touted as a
Peace Prize is entirely due to An Inconvenientgreat idea so that the evil car drivers can pay for
Truth--conveniently, it has few truths. Gore's biggesttheir crimes against the planet. The income tax was
case to link human activity to global warming is thealso sold to us as a means to tax those evil rich
theory that carbon dioxide levels are directlypeople and the last I checked, the IRS robs all of us
responsible for increases in temperature. His graphsevery two weeks. These taxes are merely a means
and animations certainly looked sharp and gave anfor one group to steal money from another group
aura of authority. However, CO2 and risingfor their own agenda. A carbon tax is not backed by
temperatures are not related in the fashion Gorescientific fact and is going to be most destructive to
suggests. He would have you think thatregular people who rely on their car to make a living.
temperatures rise as a result of increased CO2 levels.Absolutely no legislation or government regulation as
Statistically, the warmer periods in Earth's historya result of global warming is going to solve the
came about 800 years before an increase in CO2;"problem" or make any of us better off. Supporting
that means CO2 levels increased after temperaturesgovernment global warming initiatives is equivalent to
increased. In other words, adjusting our "carbonstarving and robbing other people. The war on drugs,
emissions" may not affect global temperatures.the war on poverty, the war on anything is another
It would also be wise to look back at grade schoolway to ensure the problem will never be solved. The
science. We know that plant life thrive in high CO2war on drugs has not reduced drug use but has
environments. The more green on earth the better.instead put enormous amounts of people in jail for
Increased plant life will lead to an increase in wildlifenon-aggressive crimes and has created a black
and the problem of starving nations could be moremarket where the truly bad are benefiting.
easily solved; the more places for agriculture, theIf all those who preach the gospel of global warming
more food we can produce.are really humanitarians, they would stop using
That is some of the science and it has been knowngovernment to do their bidding. The fact of the
for years. Global warming fanatics have disregarded itmatter is that more people are going to be worse
and the public has blindly accepted their false science.off and perhaps die due to our policies regarding an
Why? Because we are morally good. We want to dounproven scientific theory. Those who believe global
what is right and presenting global warming as awarming is a crisis can act without using government
result of human activity puts the moral responsibilityforce. Automakers have responded with hybrid
in our hands. Inconveniently for the global warmingvehicles, better gas mileage, and even all electric
fear mongers, the war against global warming isvehicles. No party is worse off because of these
largely immoral and chances are, human activity is notimprovements and actions. That is the moral way to
the cause of global warming.deal with global warming.
Amongst the most immoral propositions in the war