The Secret Scientific Debate On Global Warming

The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Changethe mainstream press. Coleman stated: "It (global
(IPCC) gave a grim assessment of the impact ofwarming) is the greatest scam in history. I am
global climate change in a new report datedamazed, appalled and highly offended by it. ... Some
November 17, 2007. According to the Panel's latestdastardly scientists with environmental and political
report, the build-up of carbon dioxide on Earthmotives manipulated long term scientific data to
already imperils islands, coastlines, and a fifth tocreate an illusion of rapid global warming. Other
two-thirds of the world's species.scientists of the same environmental whacko type
The IPCC panel report says that global warming isjumped into the circle to support and broaden the
"unequivocal". It estimates that as early as the year"research" to further enhance the totally slanted,
2020 between 75 and 250 million people in Africa willbogus global warming claims. Their friends in
suffer water shortages. It goes on to state thatgovernment steered huge research grants their way
residents of Asia's largest cities will be at great riskto keep the movement going. Soon they claimed to
of river and coastal flooding. Europeans can expectbe a consensus. I have read dozens of scientific
extensive species loss. North Americans willpapers. I have talked with numerous scientists. I have
experience longer and hotter heat waves andstudied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct.
greater competition for water.There is no run away climate change."
In the best case scenario, temperatures will keepAlso consider the comments of Colorado State
rising from carbon already in the atmosphere, theUniversity's Hurricane expert Dr. William Gray: "The
report said. Climate change is here as witnessed byonly inconvenient truth about global warming is that a
melting snow and glaciers, higher averagegenuine debate has never actually taken place.
temperatures, and rising sea levels. If unchecked,Hundreds of scientists, many of them prominent in
global warming will spread hunger and disease, putthe field, agree. They've been brainwashing us for 20
further stress on water resources, cause fierceryears," Gray says. "This scare will also run its course.
storms and more frequent droughts, and could driveIn 15-20 years, we'll look back and see what a hoax
up to 70 percent of plant and animal species tothis was." Gray acknowledges that we've had some
extinction.warming the past 30 years. "I don't question that," he
"We have already committed the world to sea levelexplains. "And humans might have caused a very
rise," the panel's chairman, Rajendra Pachauri, said. Butslight amount of this warming. Very slight. But this
if the Greenland ice sheet melts, the scientists said,warming trend is not going to keep on going. My
they could not predict by how many feet the seasbelief is that three, four years from now, the globe
will rise, drowning coastal cities. Climate changewill start to cool again, as it did from the middle '40s
imperils "the most precious treasures of our planet,"to the middle '70s."
he said, and the effects are "so severe and soThen there are the opinions of highly respected
sweeping that only urgent global action will do. Weclimatologist, Roger Pielke Sr. at the University of
are all in this together. We must work together."Colorado: Pielke contends there isn't enough
"The world's scientists have spoken clearly and withintellectual diversity in the debate. He claims a few
one voice," UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said,vocal individuals are quoted "over and over" again,
"I expect the world's policy makers to do the same."when in fact there are a variety of opinions. "I think
The world scientists that U.N. Secretary General Banthe media is in the ideal position to do that. If the
Ki-moon refers to are apparently members of themedia honestly presented the views out there, which
United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climatethey rarely do, things would change."
Change. However, the Nobel prize winning IPCC is aThe skeptical opinions of scientists Coleman, Grey
political body appointed by the U.N. Many of theand Pielke are not isolated. In fact, 19,000 scientists
3,000 members of this panel are not scientists, buthave signed a petition that states: "There is no
are political appointees. The few real scientists on theconvincing scientific evidence that human release of
panel have in the past disputed the panel's findingscarbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses
and had their comments deleted from the reports.is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause
Several of these scientists have even asked to havecatastrophic heating of the Earth's atmosphere and
their names removed from the panel's report. Theirdisruption of the Earth's climate. Moreover, there is
requests have been denied. Some scientists havesubstantial scientific evidence that increases in
actually had to sue the panel to have their namesatmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial
removed.effects upon the natural plant and animal
So do the world's scientists all agree and speak withenvironments of the Earth."
one voice on the issue of global warming? Is globalGlobal warming may well turn out to be the serious
warming "unequivocal"? It does not look like thoseproblem identified in the United Nations report.
statements can be attributed to scientists connectedHowever, there is a ongoing debate in the scientific
with the IPCC. The talking point that all scientistscommunity about global warming and its effects.
speak with "one voice" on global warming has beenWorld scientists do not speak with "one voice" and
heard in Al Gore's global warming presentations and isdo not all agree that long term global warming is
now being used in comments by the United Nations"unequivocal". The fact that there is a concerted
Secretary General.effort to keep the scientific debate on global
Certainly the comments from early last week fromwarming a public secret should make us feel as
John Coleman (founder of the Weather Channel)uncomfortable as the findings on global warming in
don't indicate a consensus of opinion on globalthe latest United Nations Report.
warming. His comments went generally unreported by