The Two Key Challenges to Finding a Solution to Climate Change

"A person's life is composed of minutes and is mostprobably much poorer) life by their mid and later life.
fulfilled by working and bringing one's earnings to theMost of us, and certainly those who have given up
family table." So wrote Tim Gautreaux in thesmoking, drinking or overeating, are aware of how
Guardian Magazine on 31st July 2010. Tim is adifficult, and how much time, can be involved in
Louisiana local whose life has been turned upsidemaking change. Making the change to how we
down by the oil spill in the Mexican Gulf but withgenerate the energy that underpins our civilization is
those few words he illustrates why the problem ofgoing to be no different. Thankfully, it is equally
global warming is so difficult for most people toachievable. There is just one more little problem that
engage with, far less get engaged with solutions toneeds to be sorted out, though.
climate change."A person's life... is most fulfilled by working and
The human life is not the shortest span of time livingbringing one's earnings to the family table." Money has
things can spend on the planet, nor is it the longest.been around pretty much as long as modern humans
Biological life spans are so much shorter thansettled down to become farmers. Money is an
geological ones that it can sometimes seemimportant part of our societies today and most of us
impossible to believe that what a person does in theirwill have frequent contact with it during our daily lives.
life can have any effect on the planet's climate. ButDenied access to it makes us feel lesser beings.
humans have found powerful ways to speed up howHow we account for our money, however has a
they can impact the environment.much shorter history. All modern accounting and
Over geological time, a drip of water falling on adecision making tools only became possible after the
stone will wear it away and the flowing of theinvention of double-entry book-keeping a little over
Colorado River generated the Grand Canyon. But less500 years ago. It literally changed the way that
than a human lifetime ago, during the nineteen fifties,people were able to think about their economic
when hydrogen bombs a thousand times moreactivities.
powerful than the atomic device that destroyedAt the heart of the system is the concept of
Hiroshima were being tested, the US Atomic Energybalance: ones assets and liabilities must always be in
Commission seriously suggested that a new andbalance and the strength of an entity is represented
better canal could be created through Panama usingin its "balance sheet".
just a couple of dozen of the devices. While theThere is however an unfortunate element to the
threat of thermo-nuclear war has, thankfully,timing of this development. 500 years ago there
receded, the climate is being impacted by thewere many fewer people on the planet and they had
aggregation of our individual actions.not discovered how to use fossil fuels like coal, oil
In many ways, Global warming can be thought of asand gas in any meaningful way. Little wonder that the
being caused by processes that are more akin to theoriginators of the system overlooked the fact that
drips of water which have been concentrated into ausing the natural services of the planet like fresh air
powerful jet of water. Every time we use fossil fuelsand clean water carried a cost. Even when these
to generate our electricity, every time we use petrolcosts did begin to be evident, the economists
gasoline to power our vehicles, every time we burndecided that the environment could simply be
gas for our central heating, every time we use oilconsidered an "externality"; something that existed
based fertilizers to grow our food, every time weand operated separately from the economic system.
clear a forest for its lumber or to convert it toThat has brought us into the ridiculous position where
pasture, we contribute to the problem. It has beenour economic activity not only is destroying the
going on for generations and while the early ones canfuture but we are able to reassure ourselves that
fairly claim to have been acting in ignorance, thesuch action is "rational behaviour" because using the
science of climate change dates back to the middlefossil fuels is the "cheapest" way to get energy.
of the 19th century and the first calculations ofFaced with such a situation, the only really rational
human activity's potential impacts to the early part ofresponse is the change the system so that we
the 20th century.reward our economic activity on the basis of how it
Evidence that the effect was actually occurring hasreplenishes the Earth's eco-systems so that when
been growing for about two generations now andordinary people go to work the earnings they bring
today it is unequivocal: 97% of scientists working inback to the family table are not at the expense of
the field support the tenets of human induced climatetheir children.
change*.We have invented an accounting system before:
But "a person's life is composed of minutes". Whythere is no reason we should not invent it again. But
should this be the time to worry, to take action?this time base it on encouraging us to live with the
Quite simply because people the problems that risingplanet rather than on it. A system that will assist us in
global temperatures will bring are already becomingreclaiming a safe climate. A system that will bring
evident: without action now, people already on themake climate change solutions profitable and
planet now will face a much more difficult (andattractive.