There is No Man Made Climate Crisis (Global Warming is a Hoax)

The mainstream media has got a very large portiondestroys the fundamentals of the theory behind
of the population duped into believing that humans"global warming".
have caused some sort of climate crisis (globalIf it's not CO2 that's behind climate change, then
warming) and that paying new emissions taxes willwhat is causing all this apparent warming (we are
somehow fix all that is wrong with the world. Thisactually in a cooling period, more on that later) that is
"crisis" is actually the greatest scam of all time and ismelting the polar ice caps and raising sea levels? I
based on bad science. It is a classic Problem/Reactionknow this might sound crazy so I'm just going to
Solution that is being used to line the pockets of fatthrow this idea out there for you to chew on for a
cat "environmentalists" and further enslave humanity.bit... Could it possibly be the sun? When Dr. Sami
In this article I will explain why the so called "climateSolanki, director of the Max Planck Institute for Solar
crisis" is fallacy and nothing to worry about, who isSystem Research in Germany analyzed sunspot
behind it, and why you should refuse to pay a tax oncycles and compared them to temperatures on
living/breathing.earth, he found it stunningly obvious that when there
In the mainstream media it appears as though theare more solar flares, also known as sunspots, the
"global warming" debate is over. We are facing atemperature goes up to reflect the increase in solar
great problem, our carbon dioxide emissions haveactivity. It's not only more heat from the sun that
caused Earth's temperature to rise and if we don't docauses warming, cosmic rays interacting with water
something to stop it right now we will face greatvapour create clouds which effect the temperature
cataclysmic events. The polar ice caps will melt, ourof earth. When there is strong solar radiation (more
ocean levels will rise and displace hundreds of millionssunspots), fewer solar ray particles get through to
of people, species will go extinct, and humanity will bethe earth, resulting in fewer clouds. When there are
brought to its knees. The truth is that what isfewer clouds, more solar heat is able to get through.
presented to us as scientifically proven fact in theWhen studying cosmic ray and temperature records
mainstream is still hotly contested by tens ofgoing back up to six million years, you will find that
thousands of the world's top scientists, and no realwhen there is less solar radiation there are more
debate has even been done. Today you receivecloud-forming cosmic rays, and temperatures go
dumbfounded looks or worse if you even begin todown. When solar radiation increases you will find that
question the validity of the idea that man madethe temperature goes up, every single time. I have
global warming exists and is caused by CO2included a graph on my blog which shows the
emissions. More likely you are ridiculed and possiblyrelationship between cosmic-rays and cloud cover,
even considered to be suffering from a mentaland another graph showing the relationship between
disorder when you present such a blasphemoussunspots and global temperature. Anyone with half a
question. Global warming has developed an almostbrain should be able to see that the sun is obviously
religious, or cult-like following in the years since Althe driving factor when it comes to the temperature
Gore's An Inconvenient Truth was produced andon earth.
marketed through the mainstream media and wasOften we are told that our planet is warmer now
sent to schools as part of a new curriculum tothan ever before in recorded history. What they
indoctrinate our youth into the new religion offorget to mention is that "recorded history" means
"climate change". Suddenly and without debate, asomewhere between 1860 and 1914. Our planet has
pseudo-scientific theory became fact almost overbeen through many cycles, some lasting tens or
night. To this day Al Gore and his fellowhundreds of thousands of years, so are records from
fear-mongering "environmentalists" refuse any sort ofonly 150 years ago really all that meaningful?
debate on the subject and proclaim that it is just tooResearch by a study team at Harvard University
urgent to waste time debating something so sillyshowed that we have had much higher temperatures
when what we need to do is focus on the solution. Ain the last thousand years, and we are not at an
solution which just happens to make Al Gore veryextreme at either end of the spectrum. Between the
rich. If global warming caused by man made carbon9th and 14th centuries the temperatures were much
dioxide emissions is such a silly thing to debate, whywarmer than today and in the 15th century there
don't they just do the debate and get it over with?was the beginning of the "Little Ice Age" during which
Why won't Al Gore and other alarmists debate themany rivers and waterways iced over and people
issue? I suspect the reason they will not engage inhad to adapt to the cooler temperatures. We are
the debate is because they are wrong, and debatingcurrently not even in a warm period when compared
it would prove them so. John Coleman, founder ofto the last 60 years or so we are actually in a cooling
The Weather Channel, along with over 30,000 otherphase. Below is a graph which shows the current
scientists are now trying to sue Al Gore for fraud.cooling trend. Recent news reports show that 2008
They feel that since the mainstream media will notwas the coldest year in the last century, with many
cover both sides of the story, there is no other waycountries reporting record amounts of snow in places
to get the issue looked at seriously, so they arethat don't normally get any. You might find it funny
taking it to the courts.to know that The International Organization for
It is evident that the climate on earth is indeedGlobal Warming had to postpone last years
changing, but the climate on earth is always changingconference due to an unexpected blizzard and record
and humans have very little influence over it. Abreaking cold weather. These climate changes are
professor by the name of Nir Shaviv from thenatural, ever-present, and are nothing to be afraid of.
Institute of Physics at the University of JerusalemEven if carbon dioxide was causing warming of our
discovered that there have been periods in earth'searth, carbon taxes would not be a solution to the
history where there was up to ten times as muchproblem. Paying carbon taxes to fight carbon dioxide
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere as there is now,emissions would be about as effective as trying to
yet it had next to no impact on earth's temperature.fix a car that won't start by changing the rear wheel.
Professer Ian Clark of the Department of EarthCarbon taxes are a sick trick being played on the
Sciences at the University of Ottowa is quotedpublic by a group of greedy scam artists. Paying a
saying "If we look at climate from the geologicaltax makes the environment better? Since when?
timeframe we would never suspect CO2 as a majorEven if that tax money went to pay people to plant
climate driver. You can't say that CO2 will drivetrees or invest in renewable energy research and
climate, it certainly never did in the past". Dr. Piersdevelopment (which it doesn't) it would not likely
Corbyn, a weather forecaster who uses sunspots tomake a noticeable or substantial difference to the
predict weather patterns, said that CO2 does notbetterment of our environment or our ability to
explain any past weather patterns. Professor Patricksustain a non-changing climate. But since CO2 is not
Michaels of the Department of Environmentalbehind climate change at all, there is absolutely no
Sciences at the University of Virginia has said thatreason that anybody should pay taxes on carbon
"anyone who goes around and says that carbonemissions. If such carbon tax legislation ever does
dioxide is responsible for most of the warming of thepass, I hope that everyone will stand together in
20th century hasn't looked at the basic numbers".protest of them and refuse to pay such ludicrous
One main reason that some people believe CO2fees.
causes warming is the results of ice core surveysMany will accuse people who have done research into
that can measure earth temperatures over hundredsthe global warming scam to be anti-environment,
of thousands of years. In Al Gore's An Inconvenientencouraging pollution, supporting big oil, or a plethora
Truth it is said that for 650,000 years the ice coreof other things. I personally have been accused of
surveys show correlation between CO2 and"enjoying toxic air pollution and supporting the
temperature. "When there is more carbon dioxide,scourge of cancer" after speaking out about the
the temperature gets warmer". While the ice coretruth behind the whole man made climate change
surveys certainly do show that CO2 and warmingscam. For some reason, which I suspect might be
seem to go together, Al Gore and his team make antelevision and mainstream media mind programming,
incorrect assumption when they state that it is thepeople make a connection that links people who are
CO2 that causes the warming. Professor Ian Clarkskeptical of man made global warming ("climate
says that Al Gore's team got it backwards, and thatchange deniers") to encouraging pollution. To make
the warming actually causes the CO2. The ice corethis perfectly clear, there is no such connection. CO2
samples show that the warming leads the CO2 byisn't causing temperature changes but that doesn't
about 800 years which means it could not possibly bemean you should run your car more often or quit
the CO2 causing the temperature to change. Clarkrecycling. I am in full support of exploring new clean
says that carbon dioxide is a product of temperature,renewable energy sources and better waste
not the other way around, and that completelymanagement and disposal.