| Global Warming is a serious issues say its proponents | | | | hard to submit to all the fuss. |
| and they demand to be heard and have started a | | | | One must consider when reading information online in |
| huge PR campaign to alert the world of the | | | | an Internet Forum or Blog that the information |
| impending doom and gloom. If you do not listen or | | | | purported as fact even if the poster believes them |
| call these PR efforts questionable or ho hum and give | | | | to be so, is not conclusionary. Indeed, the question of |
| them a flip response you have another thing coming. | | | | the data being submitted in the media and online and |
| Many scientists who do not believe in Global Warming | | | | its sources and paid scientific agenda based funding is |
| have found themselves ridiculed by their scientific | | | | also in question, especially from the Doom and Gloom |
| domains and even the scientific community in general. | | | | side of things. |
| Merely as a private citizen on an Internet Forum you | | | | This accusation of the "Burying the reality of Global |
| will find yourself lambasted if you call the Global | | | | Warming" by scientists who do not believe in the |
| Warming theory a bunch of hot air or give their | | | | Theory is interesting, because indeed this is the |
| rhetorical debate. | | | | exact tactic that the Global Warming Alarmists use |
| After listening to all the Global Warming Alarmists I | | | | against the voices of reason and the contrary |
| think a “flip” response is apropos, in | | | | scientific opinions. |
| other words I just not listening to these debates | | | | I certainly hope this article is of interest and that is |
| based solely on CO2 increase charts without new | | | | has propelled thought. The goal is simple; to help you |
| data which includes, solar cycles, pole axis movement, | | | | in your quest to be the best in 2007. I thank you for |
| volcanic activity, ozone cycles and space energy. | | | | reading my many articles on diverse subjects, which |
| Perhaps even other theories of weather control. Too | | | | interest you. |
| many factors are not discussed and therefore it is | | | | |